Monday, December 30, 2013

Gap’s Athleta Brand Could Win From Lululemon PR Blunder

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU) has a serious brand damage in the making. the question is whether it is permanent or whether or not it will pass over. The company’s scandal has moved from see-through pants and material balling up, and now it includes the company’s founder in a public relation blunder that he created. The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GPS) may be thanking the company for both issues.

This “Size” dilemma is nothing new. Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF) has been under fire previously for its stance against big clothing sizes. The company’s stance was that its clothes are not made for larger people. A&F’s shares have been in the gutter, but this sure seems like a series of product missteps and weaker sales which likely had nothing to do with turning larger-size buyers away.

Lululemon founder Chip Wilson has recently apologized to his workers in a video after a Bloomberg interview where he said that some of the issues from the pant dilemma are simply that the pants might not work well on women of certain sizes with rubbing issues.

The reality is that some of these comments may simply be true, but how that message is conveyed or whether or not it should have been conveyed is another issue entirely. It is true that some people just do not look good in certain clothes. How people come to that realization, and how they are told about that, is a dilemma.

Why The Gap, Inc. (NYSE: GPS) can win here is that Gap does cater to larger sizes in many cases. Its Banana Republic stores have often not really catered to larger sizes, but Old Navy and Gap have larger sizes. The real opportunity is its newer Athleta line that has grown in popularity. What the public needs to understand is that its models and its clothing are not exactly flattering in many of the larger sizes either, but the company could still possibly capitalize at Lululemon’s expenses.

Athleta has a large mail catalog business, and it has had retail stores since 2011. There is an opportunity for it to attract even more of the Lululemon customers, but the store concept just might not be widespread enough to make much of a difference. We warned back on November 1 that the risk was more than meets the eye here for Lululemon investors, and shares were closer to $67.50 then. That was before this blunder turned into something worse.

This is something that needs to be paid attention to. Lululemon shares closed down another 2.9% at $66.95 against a 52-week trading range of $59.60 to $82.50. It still has a whopping $9.7 billion market cap versus $19 billion for The Gap, but last year’s annual sales were $15.65 billion for Gap versus $1.37 billion for Lululemon.

Top Tech Companies To Watch In Right Now

This public dilemma of Lululemon is an interesting one. There may not be a clear answer. Companies do deserve the right to have their designs made for certain customers. Perhaps the biggest issue is simply how they handle delivering that message. Slogans like “Fat people go elsewhere” are not going to give you the best reputation in the public. Simply stating “We have a target market that includes a range of sizes, and that is what we are sticking with” may be a better direction.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

7 Stocks Moving on Unusual Volume

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- Professional traders running mutual funds and hedge funds don't just look at a stock's price moves; they also track big changes in volume activity. Often when above-average volume moves into an equity, it precedes a large spike in volatility.

Major moves in volume can signal unusual activity, such as insider buying or selling -- or buying or selling by "superinvestors."

Unusual volume can also be a major signal that hedge funds and momentum traders are piling into a stock ahead of a catalyst. These types of traders like to get in well before a large spike, so it's always a smart move to monitor unusual volume. That said, remember to combine trend and price action with unusual volume. Put them all together to help you decipher the next big trend for any stock.

With that in mind, let's take a look at several stocks rising on unusual volume today.

Kraton Performance Polymers (KRA)

This company is a producer of styrenic block copolymers and other engineered polymers. This stock closed up 5.3% to $20.76 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 605,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 269,288

Volume % Change: 125%

From a technical perspective, KRA ripped higher here back above its 50-day moving average of $19.96 with above-average volume. This move also pushed shares of KRA into breakout territory, since the stock took out some near-term overhead resistance at $20.07. This move is starting to push shares of KRA within range of triggering another big breakout trade. That trade will hit if KRA manages to take out Wednesday's high of $21.18 and then once it clears more resistance at $22.16 to $23.17 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in KRA as long as it's trending above its 50-day at $19.96 or above Wednesday's low of $19.63, and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 269,288 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then KRA will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $25 to $27.

Net 1 Ueps Technologies (UEPS)

This company is a provider of payment solutions and transaction processing services across multiple industries. This stock closed up 7.5% to $11.92 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 364,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 157,230

Volume % Change: 133%

From a technical perspective, UEPS ripped sharply higher here right above some near-term support at $11 with strong upside volume. This stock recently gapped up sharply from $7 to $11 with strong upside volume. Following that move, shares of UEPS have trended sideways inside of a consolidation chart pattern. This move on Wednesday has now pushed UEPS into breakout territory, since the stock took out the upper-end of its sideways range at $11.63.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in UEPS as long as it's trending above support at $11, and then once it sustains a move or close above Wednesday's high of $12.18 with volume that hits near or above 157,230 shares. If we get that move soon, then UEPS will set up to enter new 52-week high territory, which is bullish technical price action. Some possible upside targets off that move are $14 to $15.

Theravance (THRX)

This is a biopharmaceutical company with a pipeline of internally discovered product candidates and strategic collaborations with pharmaceutical companies. This stock closed up 2.5% at $38.74 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 1.69 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 916,688

Volume % Change: 140%

From a technical perspective, shares of THRX jumped modestly higher here back above its 50-day moving average of $37.88 with strong upside volume. This stock has been trending sideways for the last month and change, with shares moving between $39.73 on the upside and $34.76 on the downside. Shares of THRX are now starting to move within range of triggering a breakout trade above the upper-end of its recent sideways trading chart pattern. That breakout will hit if THRX manages to take out Wednesday's high of $39.28 and then once it clears more resistance at $39.73 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in THRX as long as it's trending above its 50-day at $37.88 or above $36, and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 916,688 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then THRX will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week high at $42.96.

Treehouse Foods (THS)

This company is a food manufacturer servicing mainly the retail grocery and foodservice distribution channels. This stock closed up 1.3% to $68.30 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 411,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 138,234

Volume % Change: 196%

From a technical perspective, THS trended modestly higher here with above-average volume. This stock recently downtrended badly from its August high of $74.54 to its low of $63.37. During that move, shares of THS were consistently making lower highs and lower lows, which is bearish technical price action. Since hitting that low of $63.37, shares of THS have rebounded sharply and it's now trending within range of triggering a near-term breakout trade. That trade will hit if THS manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance at $68.62 to its 50-day moving average of $68.97 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in THS as long as it's trending above some key near-term support at $67, and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 138,234 shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then THS will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $72 to $74.

Gogo (GOGO)

This company provides a suite of connectivity solutions and other services, including Passenger Connectivity, Passenger Entertainment, In-Flight Portal as well as Operations-Oriented Communications Services. This stock closed up 10.7% at $13.57 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 3.02 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 759,941

Volume % Change: 432%

From a technical perspective, GOGO bounced sharply higher here right above its 50-day moving average of $12.01 with heavy upside volume. This stock has been uptrending strong for the last month, with shares moving higher from its low of $9.71 to its intraday high of $13.75. During that move, shares of GOGO have been consistently making higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of GOGO within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if GOGO manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $13.89 to $14.35 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in GOGO as long as it's trending above $13 or $12.50, and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that this near or above 759,941 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then GOGO will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $15.50 to its all-time high at $17.

British American Tobacco (BTI)

This is a holding company that owns, directly or indirectly investments in the numerous companies constituting the British American Tobacco Group of companies. This stock closed up 0.66% at $105.41 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 2.37 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 201,433

Volume % Change: 1122%

From a technical perspective, BTI trended modestly higher here right off its 50-day moving average of $104.64 with heavy upside volume. This stock has been uptrending strong for the last few weeks, with shares moving higher from its low of $100.83 to its intraday high of $105.53. During that move, shares of BTI have been consistently making higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in BTI as long as it's trending above its 200-day at $104.13, and then once it sustains a move or close above Wednesday's high of $105.53 to more resistance at $106 with volume that hits near or above 201,433 shares. If we get that move soon, then BTI will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $107.53 to $110.

Xoom (XOOM)

This company provides online consumer-to-consumer international money transfers in close to 30 countries. The company's customers use its website to send money to friends and families in these countries. This stock closed up 5.5% at $32.38 in Wednesday's trading session.

Wednesday's Volume: 3.96 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 265,931

Volume % Change: 1201%

From a technical perspective, shares of XOOM gapped sharply higher here and broke out above some near-term overhead resistance at $32 with heavy upside volume. This stock recently pulled back sharply from its July high of $36.46 to its recent low of $26.34. It looks like the downside volatility for XOOM is over in the short-term now that this stock has trended back above its 50-day with heavy upside volume flows.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in XOOM as long as it's trending above $30, and then once it sustains a move or close above Wednesday's high at $33.46 with volume that's near or above 265,931 shares. If we get that move soon, then XOOM will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week high at $36.46.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.

 

RELATED LINKS:

 

>>5 Tech Stocks Spiking on Big Volume

 

>>5 Stocks Setting Up to Break Out

 

>>4 Red-Flag Stocks to Sell This Fall

 

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

 

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

 

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including CNBC.com and Forbes.com. You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Wednesday, December 25, 2013

3 Dividend Stocks To Calm A Nervous Investor

Philip Morris InternationalAs the economy continues to improve, it's pretty clear that the Fed will curb its buying of securities to signal a change in interest rate policy.  The very mention of this has caused Treasury yields to increase, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

Although interest rates have risen lately, we shouldn't project this trend to continue at the same rapid rate. I think the pace will slow, as the Fed takes specific action over the next several months.

Many investors have reacted to the possibility of higher rates by selling REIT stocks, bonds and dividend stocks. Apparently some think that higher rates obviate the need for holding income-related stocks. I couldn't disagree more. While the eventual market for higher yielding bonds may come, that does not take away the current attractiveness of high paying dividend stocks.

There are a number of rational, opportunistic ways investors should react to a Fed that may "take the foot off the gas" rather than "hit the brake."  (Remember the Fed has yet to change anything at this point. Bernanke has merely reminded us that he has the ability to accelerate, decelerate or make no changes at all in market purchases.)

A healthy way to react to this possible shift in Fed policy is to stay with your original program that you have presumably formulated with a long-term investment horizon in mind. Such a program should always allow you to tinker with the boundaries of your discipline.

For example, I continue to manage portfolios with the same discipline as always, but presently I have an additional eye toward some of my favorite dividend stocks that may go on sale as a result of the current confusion about the Fed's intentions. I've always liked stocks with high quality balance sheets that pay increasing dividends, and if I can buy them at reasonable prices, I usually jump right in.

Some investors are getting inappropriately caught up in the emotions of rising rates. If you've only bought dividend stocks to offset the very low income rates that bonds offered, you're only getting half the story. True, there was no other place to find higher income when rates were expected to remain low, but dividend stocks also offer the potential of a rising dividend.  Think of it as if each stock had its own "Fed" raising the dividend rate the company must pay out to shareholders.

Special Offer: Finding undervalued gems can be a tough task. Get the names of five rock–solid companies with real, tangible growth drivers and big money making potential in the free report 5 Bargain Stocks To Buy Now.

You should look for dividend paying stocks that have a rising trend and the financial strength to make the increases without causing the company additional financial stress. In addition, I suggest you run any dividend stock candidate through my dividend integrity index concept on Forbes. It is a useful check to see if the dividend payout ratio is compatible with the rate of dividend increases.

Here are several of my favorite portfolio holdings that are still attractive regardless of how high interest rates rise:

People's United Financial (PBCT). With a dividend yield of 4.2% this mid-sized New England based bank has raised its dividend for the past five years. The possibility of higher interest rates could be a positive for PBCT since it may allow the bank to increase its net interest margin. People's has been slowly growing its geographic footprint and may well be an acquisition target as big players may pursue banks like this to grow.

Another stock I like is Tronox Tronox. This spinoff from Kerr-McGee has had its warts, and emerged from bankruptcy back in 2011. TROX makes specialty chemical pigments that are used in everyday consumer applications such as paints and plastics. Although it doesn't have a long history of dividend payments, prospects for the company's products look bright as the economy continues to improve.  Best of all it is paying a hefty 4.6% yield.

Monday, December 23, 2013

Oil Prices Quietly Reach New Highs

Stocks spiked late in trading today after the Federal Reserve released the minutes of its most recent Federal Open Market Committee meeting, but the euphoria only lasted a few minutes before markets settled near breakeven for the day. As of 3:15 p.m. EDT, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) is down 0.18%, while the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC  ) has fallen just 0.19%.

The FOMC meeting minutes released today showed that about half of the members thought the Fed's $85 billion-per-month asset purchase program should end late this year. This isn't earth-shattering news, but it gives investors an idea as to what the Fed thinks about the future of the economy, interest rates, and tapering. If unemployment falls in the second half of the year and GDP grows, it will likely lead to reduced asset purchases, although Ben Bernanke and Co. have some wiggle room depending on what data shows. So we should expect higher interest rates to continue, which isn't all bad, because it shows that the economy is improving. 

It may not be getting the same attention today, but oil has quietly reached a new 52-week high of more than $106 per barrel. The U.S. Energy Information Administration said crude-oil stockpiles fell 9.9 million barrels last week following a 10 million-barrel drop the week before. To put that figure into perspective, the U.S. consumes about 19 million barrels per day, and there are a total of 374 million barrels of crude-oil reserves, not including another 696 million barrels in the strategic petroleum reserve. 

Dow components ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) and Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) have actually fallen slightly on oil's new high because they may not see a big benefit from higher prices. Oil is becoming more expensive to extract, and demand isn't rising rapidly, which would lead to higher profits from refining, retail, and extraction. Instead, demand is flat or declining slightly in the developed world, and there are big worries that supply disruptions will hit the Middle East as violence spreads there.

High oil prices will also squeeze refining activities, which have enjoyed high profit margins because gas prices have remained elevated despite oil's falling to less than $100 for much of the past year. The higher prices may squeeze margins, making high oil prices both a positive and a negative for big oil.

Big oil may not pop on high oil prices, but there are some companies that will definitely benefit from high oil prices. For some currently intriguing energy plays at the leading edge of oil exploration, check out The Motley Fool's "3 Stocks for $100 Oil." For FREE access to this special report, simply click here now.

Top 5 China Companies To Invest In Right Now

Sunday, December 22, 2013

This Overlooked Strategy Could Protect Your Fixed-Income Investments -- And Return Up ...

In May, the interest rate on the 10-year Treasury note rose from about 1.6% to more than 2.2%. As rates rise, bond prices fall, and an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks Treasury notes, iShares Barclays 7-10 Year Treasury (NYSE: IEF), dropped 3.1% in May.

Since then, rates have fallen back toward 2%. Fixed-income investors must now decide whether they expect rates to continue moving higher.

Many investors hold fixed-income investments to reduce portfolio volatility and provide steady income. A popular strategy is to invest 60% of a portfolio in stocks and 40% in bonds. If rates rise, the bond holdings could sustain large losses, and investors may lose principal that is equal to several years' worth of income.

 

After a sharp move in the market leads to losses, some investors consider selling. In this case, those investors may be thinking they should sell their bond funds and reinvest later at higher rates. Of course, if rates don't rise, they will suffer a loss of income but have no benefit from the trade.

But there are other options available. Conservative investors use covered calls and other option strategies to protect their investments in the stock market. Similar strategies are available in the bond markets but are often overlooked.

If you own bond ETFs, now is an excellent time to sell options on them. Their recent losses have led to an increase in volatility for those funds, and options prices tend to rise along with volatility.

Covered calls are one way to protect an investment in bond ETFs. With a covered call, you sell a call option on a stock that you own. Each options contract covers 100 shares of a stock or ETF. For IEF, for example, you could sell a call expiring in December with an exercise price of $108 for about 53 cents.

Since each contract covers 100 shares of stock, the immediate income from selling the option will be $53. While you own the stock, you will collect the monthly dividend that IEF pays. That dividend varies each month. In June it was 14.2 cents per share. To be conservative, we will assume that it is 12 cents a month (it has been above that amount every month for the past year).

The option expires in December, more than six months from now. The dividend income of at least 72 cents would add to the profits already generated by selling the call.

If IEF is above $108 when the call expires, you will have to sell the ETF at that price. With IEF trading at about $104.89 now, that is a potential profit of $3.11 per share. Total profits on this trade would add up to $4.36 per share (53 cents from selling the call + $3.11 in capital gains + 72 cents in dividends), or 4.15% in six months. This represents an annualized profit of more than ! 8% from bonds.

If IEF is below $108 when the option expires, you will keep the shares and the income from selling the call and dividends. In this case, your income is almost double what it would have been with a simple buy-and-hold strategy.

Action to Take -->

-- Sell one IEF Dec 108 Call at the market price for each 100 shares of IEF you own
-- Do not use a stop-loss

A covered call is an excellent trade for cushioning potential losses in bonds while increasing income. For more aggressive traders, buying a put option may be a way to profit from a decline in bonds.

If interest rates rise 1%, IEF should be expected to fall about 7.6% for a price target of $96.93. A put option can be used to profit from declines.

When a trader buys a put, they have the right to sell 100 shares of the stock or ETF at a predetermined price for a certain amount of time. A December put with an exercise price of $105 on IEF could be bought for about $2.88. If IEF falls to $96.93, this put would be worth at least $8.07, a potential profit of 180%. You would not have to sell IEF to take the profit. You can also close this trade by selling the put in the same way you sell a stock that you own.

If interest rates rise less than 1%, IEF would show a smaller loss and the puts would show a smaller gain. If IEF is trading above $105 when the option expires in December, they would be worthless. The maximum loss is limited to the amount paid to buy the put.

Buying a put is another way to insure a fixed-income strategy against losses.

Action to Take -->

-- Buy IEF Dec 105 Puts at $3 or less
-- Do not use a stop-loss; the risk is limited to the amount paid for the option
-- If interest rates fall 1%, this option could be worth $8.07 and deliver a potential profit of 169%

This article originally appeared on ProfitableTrading.com:
An Overlooked Way to Protect Your Fixed-Income Investments Could Return Up to 180%

P.S. -- By using the exact same stocks recommended by StreetAuthority experts like Carla Pasternak, Elliott Gue, Amy Calistri and Nathan Slaughter, a retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel has figured out a way to generate an average annual gain of 21.5% during the past decade -- easily trumping the S&P's 7.3% annual gain. Find out how he did it here.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Are Sally Beauty Holdings's Earnings Worse Than They Look?

Although business headlines still tout earnings numbers, many investors have moved past net earnings as a measure of a company's economic output. That's because earnings are very often less trustworthy than cash flow, since earnings are more open to manipulation based on dubious judgment calls.

Earnings' unreliability is one of the reasons Foolish investors often flip straight past the income statement to check the cash flow statement. In general, by taking a close look at the cash moving in and out of the business, you can better understand whether the last batch of earnings brought money into the company, or merely disguised a cash gusher with a pretty headline.

Calling all cash flows
When you are trying to buy the market's best stocks, it's worth checking up on your companies' free cash flow once a quarter or so, to see whether it bears any relationship to the net income in the headlines. That's what we do with this series. Today, we're checking in on Sally Beauty Holdings (NYSE: SBH  ) , whose recent revenue and earnings are plotted below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. FCF = free cash flow. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over the past 12 months, Sally Beauty Holdings generated $210.4 million cash while it booked net income of $259.0 million. That means it turned 5.9% of its revenue into FCF. That sounds OK. However, FCF is less than net income. Ideally, we'd like to see the opposite.

All cash is not equal
Unfortunately, the cash flow statement isn't immune from nonsense, either. That's why it pays to take a close look at the components of cash flow from operations, to make sure that the cash flows are of high quality. What does that mean? To me, it means they need to be real and replicable in the upcoming quarters, rather than being offset by continual cash outflows that don't appear on the income statement (such as major capital expenditures).

For instance, cash flow based on cash net income and adjustments for non-cash income-statement expenses (like depreciation) is generally favorable. An increase in cash flow based on stiffing your suppliers (by increasing accounts payable for the short term) or shortchanging Uncle Sam on taxes will come back to bite investors later. The same goes for decreasing accounts receivable; this is good to see, but it's ordinary in recessionary times, and you can only increase collections so much. Finally, adding stock-based compensation expense back to cash flows is questionable when a company hands out a lot of equity to employees and uses cash in later periods to buy back those shares.

So how does the cash flow at Sally Beauty Holdings look? Take a peek at the chart below, which flags questionable cash flow sources with a red bar.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. TTM = trailing 12 months.

When I say "questionable cash flow sources," I mean items such as changes in taxes payable, tax benefits from stock options, and asset sales, among others. That's not to say that companies booking these as sources of cash flow are weak, or are engaging in any sort of wrongdoing, or that everything that comes up questionable in my graph is automatically bad news. But whenever a company is getting more than, say, 10% of its cash from operations from these dubious sources, investors ought to make sure to refer to the filings and dig in.

With questionable cash flows amounting to only 5.6% of operating cash flow, Sally Beauty Holdings's cash flows look clean. Within the questionable cash flow figure plotted in the TTM period above, other operating activities (which can include deferred income taxes, pension charges, and other one-off items) provided the biggest boost, at 4.1% of cash flow from operations. Overall, the biggest drag on FCF came from capital expenditures, which consumed 28.8% of cash from operations.

A Foolish final thought
Most investors don't keep tabs on their companies' cash flow. I think that's a mistake. If you take the time to read past the headlines and crack a filing now and then, you're in a much better position to spot potential trouble early. Better yet, you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home-run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

Selling to fickle consumers is a tough business for Sally Beauty Holdings or anyone else in the space. But some companies are better equipped to face the future than others. In a new report, we'll give you the rundown on three companies that are setting themselves up to dominate retail. Click here for instant access to this free report.

We can help you keep tabs on your companies with My Watchlist, our free, personalized stock tracking service.

Add Sally Beauty Holdings to My Watchlist.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Jabil Circuit shares drop on earnings, outlook

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Shares of Jabil Circuit Inc. dropped after the company's earnings and outlook fell short of Wall Street expectations.

Jabil (JBL)  shares fell more than 10% to $17.70 after the electronic contract manufacturer's adjusted quarterly earnings came in at 51 cents a share, compared with the 54 cents a share estimated by analysts surveyed by FactSet. The company's outlook also fell well below expectations.

VeriFone Systems Inc. (PAY)  shares fell 4.8% to $23.80 in heavy volume after the card-payment machine company's forecast profit for the fiscal first quarter dropped short of the analyst consensus.

KKR & Co. shares fell 4% to $23.81 after a report that the private-equity firm was close to raising $1.5 billion for a fund to invest in real estate.

Shares of KKR closed down 1.2% after the firm said it was buying KKR Financial in an all-stock deal.

More from MarketWatch

U.S. stocks fall ahead of Fed decision

H-P, Facebook rally; Twitter, Apple slip

Treasurys gain after strong 2-year note auction

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Winning with Global Small-Caps

Walter Frank has added two new international small-cap mutual funds to the model portfolios at his MoneyLetter advisory. Here's an overview from the mutual fund specialist.

Fidelity International Small-Cap (FISMX) is run by three managers who each run one of the three sleeves in the fund: Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA); Japan; and Asia Pacific ex-Japan.

Colin Stone, who managed the EMEA portion, looks for firms with above-average sales growth, a strong balance sheet, and ample cash flow, and where Fidelity's earnings estimates exceed the consensus.

Dale Nicholls pays careful attention to company-level fundamentals in the ex-Japan portfolio, with a focus on firms where growth potential is not reflected in valuation.

Nicolas Price manages the Japan portfolio, targeting firms with top line revenue growth, higher profit margins, and improving balance sheets.

The portfolio has a hefty 27% of assets in Japan, well-above the 18% average for foreign small- and mid-cap growth funds. That means the performance of the Japanese market can heavily influence the fund.

Meanwhile, the fund also is less committed to emerging markets than its peers, and has a decidedly lower average market cap. Performance this year, up 30.3%, bests 93% of its peers.

Oakmark is known as a value shop, and the managers at Oakmark Global (OARGX:US) adhere to the firm's penchant for firms selling at a significant discount to their intrinsic value estimate.

Clyde McGregor manages the US portion of the portfolio, while Bob Taylor manages the international portion. As with other Oakmark funds, this is a portfolio that is concentrated in the pair's best ideas—36% of assets are invested in the top ten stocks.

Top Undervalued Companies To Buy Right Now

The portfolio is overweight in Japan, compared to both its benchmark, and world stock category, and underweight in the UK.

By sector, the fund's greatest over-weightings are in basic materials, industrials, and technology, while it has less in consumer defensive and health care, versus its peers.

Marching to its own drummer has paid off over the long haul. From its 1999 inception, the fund has a 12% compound annualized rate of return, compared to 4% for the MSCI World index. This year, the fund bests 94% of its peers with a 29.5% return.

Subscribe to MoneyLetter here…

More from MoneyShow.com:

Small-Cap Trio for International Exposure

Big Performance from Small-Cap ETFs

A Small-Cap Dividend Strategy

Monday, December 16, 2013

Fidelity Funds: Active Versus Passive

Ten new Fidelity passive sector ETFs will track the industry benchmarks, while the respective Fidelity Select funds seek to outperform their indexes; here's a rundown on the differences between the active Selects and their passive ETF cousins, says Jack Bowers in Fidelity Monitor & Insight.

Relative to its new ETFs, Fidelity's Select funds put a sizable chunk of their assets in smaller, faster-growing firms.

While Selects often lag when small-caps are weak, they tend to deliver superior returns over the long run. Here's a review of active versus passive tradeoffs by industry:

Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (US:FDIS)

This is the one place where the index ETF (which is similar in risk and valuation) might be the better bet right now than the Select Consumer Discretionary (US:FSCPX).

Smaller firms cannot keep up with Amazon's revenue growth, but it's hard for an active manager to accept price-to-sales as a superior alternative measure to price-to-earnings. (Amazon is the top holding in the ETF, but is currently excluded from Select Consumer Discretionary.)

Consumer Staples Index ETF (US:FSTA)

It's a toss-up here. The active Select Consumer Staples (US:FDFAX) has greater emphasis on tobacco firms. That pushes it toward the value side, but also boosts risk some 10-15%.

Energy Index ETF (NY:FENY)

The active Select Energy (US:FSENX) has a clear advantage, because there are lots of smaller firms that can grow earnings faster than the heavyweights (Exxon and Chevron account for a third of the ETF, but only 20% of the Select). But the Select runs with about 15% more risk.

Financials Index ETF (NY:FNCL)

This group has a lot of recovering heavyweights (think banks), and is still prone to regulatory surprises (think Dodd-Frank and the unfinished "Volker Rule"), so the ETF may be the better bet in the short run than the Select Financial Services (US:FIDSX).

Longer term, however, Fidelity's emphasis on faster earnings growth is likely to be worth its 15% added risk.

Health Care Index ETF (NY:FHLC)

Fidelity's research strength makes the active Select Health Care (US:FSPHX) the better long-term bet. An overweight in biotech makes risk about 10-15% higher than the ETF, but from a cash-flow valuation standpoint, the active Select is a slightly better value.

Industrials Index ETF (NY:FIDU)

The active Select Industrials (US:FCYIX) has paid a price for excluding Boeing (which has struggled with its Dreamliner, but has solid growth prospects). But normally, good research should lead to superior results. The ETF is similar in risk and valuation.

Info Tech Index ETF (NY:FTEC)

This is another area where Fidelity research adds value. Select Technology (US:FSPTX) has about 15% more risk, but the ability to underweight Apple and Microsoft (which account for 22% of the ETF), in favor of faster-growing firms, is a big plus.

Materials Index ETF (NY:FMAT)

While both have similar risk, the active Select Materials (US:FSDPX) is the better value from both a P/E and cash flow standpoint. It may also benefit more from firms that use low-cost US natural gas as a feedstock.

Telecom Index ETF (NY:FCOM)

With Verizon and AT&T accounting for 44% of the ETF's assets, the active Select Telecommunications (US:FSTCX) can do well underweighting the behemoths, to seek faster growth here and abroad. The ETF is similar in risk and cash flow valuation.

Utilities Index ETF (NY:FUTY)

This is another area where research helps Select Utilities (US:FSUTX) a lot. With new trends in regulations, fuel costs, and customer-generated power, it's easy to spot and avoid trouble spots. The ETF is similar in valuation and risk.

Subscribe to Fidelity Monitor & Insight here…

More from MoneyShow.com:

Investing in Fidelity's New Sector ETFs

High Yield and High Quality

Fidelity Favorites: Focused and Leveraged

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Week In FX Asia – Will Abe's Policies Weaken Yen Further in 2014?

There is great expectation that the U.S. and Europe will lead any rebound in the developed market. Next year, the U.S. is expected to reduce the fiscal drag (increased taxes and spending seizures) that the American economy has endured in the last few years. Hopefully, this will lead to a consensus of a real growth rate of approximately +3%. That's a far better prospect than what's unfolding across the Atlantic. Recent hard and soft European data would suggest a more muted and gradual recovery for the 17-member single currency bloc.

In Japan where Abenomics reigns, additional monetary easing, and stimulus from Abe's third arrow (read: privately financed projects), should be capable of compensating the fiscal tightening (sales tax) Tokyo will initiate at the end of the first quarter in 2014. Japan is an export driven economy, a country that requires a weaker yen to further boost exports and economic growth. Critics of Abe's three arrow policies are certainly wary of the fact that increasing the inflation rate to 2% may not necessarily increase consumption and economic activity. Even changes in the structure of Japan's economy, do not necessarily mean that a lower currency may have the same effect on exports and growth. The short-yen trade has dominated many forex portfolios this past year. It has certainly been a trade of “patience,” a trade that's expected to continue to dominate in the coming year.

Please read more in Global Currencies Forecast: 2014

  Forex News Round Up | Latest Forex Market Trend – Market Pulse Japan's Agriculture Law Changes Next on Abe's Agenda Rare Riot Reignites Singapore Social Stability Doubts Chinese Leaders Pledge To Push Reforms in 2014 Experts Cites Top Three China Risks Nikkei Expected To Rise 16% In 2014 RBA Heard ‘Loud and Clear' as AUD/USD at 0.8950 Nikkei To Hit 22,000 In 2014 – Barclays Japan Ruling Parties Approve Tax Reform Policies for 2014 China Bad Bank Shares Impress on Debut Yuan Weakens As Regulators Restrict “Hot Money” Flows 30 Year Anniversary of the Floating of the Australian Dollar NZ Inflation Accelerates as RBNZ Signals 2014 Rates Move Japan Wholesale Prices Climb 2.7 Percent YoY Due to Weak Yen Japan's Ruling Party Seeking to Cut Taxes on Daily Necessities Japan's Tankan Survey Shows Business Confidence and Spending Outlook Positive Japan Plans to Spend $1.3 Billion on Employment Stimulus Japan Asks for US Flexibility on TPP Talks No Trans-pacific Trade Pact This Year Casino Bill To Drive Japanese Stocks Higher Yuan near 20 Year High at 6.0723 per dollar Japan Current Account Shows First Deficit in 9 Months BoJ Kuroda Expresses Confidence on Inflation Target Singpore Riot Highlights Foreign Worker Discontent Indian Congress Party Defeated in Key States Japan New Stimulus Has Roots in Lost Decade Japanese Economy Looking Weaker

Hot Clean Energy Stocks To Invest In 2014

WEEK AHEAD

 

* GBP Consumer Price Index
* EUR German ZEW Survey (Economic Sentiment)
* EUR Euro-Zone Consumer Price Index
* USD Consumer Price Index
* USD Federal Reserve FOMC Meeting Begins
* USD Federal Open Market Committee Rate Decision
* USD Fed's Bernanke Holds Press Conference
* NZD Gross Domestic Product
* CAD Consumer Price Index

 

The post Week In FX Asia – Will Abe's Policies Weaken Yen Further in 2014? appeared first on MarketPulse.

The following article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.

Posted-In: Forex Economics Markets

Originally posted here...

  Most Popular China Mobile Accidentally Took iPhone 5S Pre-Orders Ahead Of Official Announcement 'Streaming Only Cable Service is Coming,' Say Experts The Reason for Wednesday's Hard Fall in Stocks: 'Dangerous, But Necessary' Johnson & Johnson Shares Under Pressure For Second Day in a Row UPDATE: GE Board Approves 16% Increase in Quarterly Dividend Three Bullish Apple Data Points Related Articles () Market Wrap For December 13: Major Indices Finish The Day Flat Still More Room for Disappointment in Lululemon Benzinga Weekly Preview: Markets Anxiously Await Fed Meeting Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. Announces Increase in Quarterly Dividend to $0.2525 per Share From $0.25 FDA Approves Gilead's Once-Daily Single Tablet HIV-1 Regimen Complera® for Patients Switching from a Stable Regimen; Also Approved by European Comission Large Option Trade in Volatility, Why You Should be Paying Attention Around the Web, We're Loving... Lightspeed Trading Presents: Thunder and Tubleweeds: Trading Techniques for the New Market Enviroment Pope Francis Rips 'Trickle-Down' Economics Come See How the Pro's Trade in this Exclusive Webinar Wynn, MGM, Other Casino Giants Vying For U.S. Turf What Should You Know About AMZN? View the discussion thread. Partner Network

Friday, December 13, 2013

Why You Should Fear the Masters of the Financial Universe

Jon Stewart just did a very funny piece on "The Daily Show" about a new derivatives dust-up that Bloomberg News broke.

Earlier this year, a big Wall Street firm bought a credit default swap on debt that a private company owed to a third party. So the firm was set up to make money if that company missed any payments.

Then the firm offered the company a multi-million-dollar loan... with the condition that they would miss a payment on the other loan. They did. And the Wall Street firm walked away with a $15 million insurance payment.

Sound less than kosher? Oh, don't worry. It's perfectly legal.

"The Daily Show" team pointed out that this behavior isn't illegal but maybe should be, and that the media didn't cover it at all and maybe should have.

But there's something they missed, and it's even more frightening.

Here are the details...

There's More to the Blackstone-Codere Deal

Last year Spanish gaming company Codere SA was in deep doodoo. They still are. They had a bunch of outstanding bonds (more than 1 billion euros worth) that they were likely going to default on.

So, in comes GSO Capital Partners LP, a credit investing unit of the world's biggest private equity firm, Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX). GSO buys up a package of Codere's outstanding debt and CDS (credit default swaps) on the same debt.

Credit default swaps are derivatives. They are a type of insurance. Say you invested in Codere's bonds and you're afraid they might default and you won't get paid your interest or principal. You can buy CDS from, most likely, hedge funds or banks, and pay them premium monthly payments, just like you would on any insurance policy. If Codere defaults, you get paid and are made whole.

Well, GSO bought Codere's debt and CDS insurance on that debt. Makes sense, right?

GSO also bought out a syndicated revolving line of credit for up to 100 million euros that several banks had set up for Codere. GSO then went to Codere and said, "Hey we now control whether you're going to get any money out of this loan facility. And we'll loan you what you need to make payments on your outstanding debt, so you don't default."

But that wasn't the whole deal.

They also said to Codere, "We want you to make your next payment two days after it's due, so you technically default. Then we'll loan you the money to make your interest payment."

And that's what happened. Codere had a deal to get the money it needed to pay the interest due on its debt. But GSO wanted it to technically default by not making the next payment on time. That's because GSO wanted to collect on the insurance it bought on Codere defaulting.

Nice game, huh?

Again, Jon Stewart and his crew at Comedy Central covered this story last week. (Google "Daily Show Blackstone Codere" to watch it.)

But the situation is a little more complicated than Stewart makes it out to be.

Here's the rest of it.

Yes, GSO made Codere default so it could get paid on its default insurance (if you're a hedge fund or bank that sold them the insurance, trust me, you're pissed off). There were plenty of other investors who owned debt that were going to get paid on their CDS insurance too.

The game wasn't just to collect the insurance...

The $15 million insurance payment GSO got was nice, and it was nice for other investors who got paid too. But the cleverness of the deal was that GSO forced the company's creditors to the debt negotiating table to restructure their debt once they defaulted. Without the default, the insurance wouldn't have gotten paid, and there was a chance creditors would have renegotiated to keep the company going in hopes it eventually would pay off its debts.

GSO bought the debt to be in a better position holding it after it got paid on the insurance and after it forced a debt renegotiation on the other creditors.

That's the power of derivatives in the hands of Masters of the Universe.

Were others burned on the deal? Sure, but who cares if you've got the smarts, muscle, and capital to rig the game to your benefit?

Derivatives are weapons of mass destruction. You may not think these little derivative dust-ups affect you, and maybe they don't - at least not directly. But there are some players in the business who don't know what they don't know, and that's scary for all of us. It's the players who didn't know how the backdoor game could be played who really suffered. That will be a lesson they won't forget.

10 Best Clean Energy Stocks To Invest In Right Now

Speaking of forgetting... Things are all quiet on the derivatives front after the credit crisis that was grossly aided and abetted by derivative weapons of mass destruction, right?

Wrong.

One of the dangers of derivatives is that they're "bilateral contracts," meaning they're private, two-way trades that aren't exchange traded and therefore are not transparent.

Dodd-Frank sought to remedy that by making certain U.S. traders in certain derivatives trade them on exchanges called swap execution facilities (SEF). But there's a problem with that solution.

You see, U.S. regulators can't make other traders in other parts of the world follow U.S. rules if they don't do those trades in the United States or with U.S. entities as counterparties.

Of course that's not a problem for U.S. banks and derivatives traders. They're just setting up foreign subsidiaries (if they don't already have them, which most do) in London and Hong Kong and elsewhere to do business outside the United States so as to avoid doing their business in the open on SEFs.

You can see where this is going, can't you? Just like with the CDS trade deal above, which isn't illegal, U.S. companies were given a carve-out to set up foreign entities to do derivatives trades away from the very same swap execution facilities they were supposed to do their trades on because some or any transparency is better than none.

It's getting bad. Now, not only are more derivatives trades (by U.S. entities) being done away from prying eyes in places where regulations are far more lax than in the United States, but by spreading their trades around, traders are splitting markets. That "fragmentation" is going to undermine liquidity and "netting" that's an absolute must when stresses in the derivatives markets cause the whole dance floor to shimmy and shake.

So what's the moral of the story?

The derivatives dance is a dangerous waltz. Pick your dance partners well, and when enough punch is spilled on the dance floor, realize that that ain't a new dance derivatives traders are doing, it's probably the electric slide... as in slide off a cliff.

Silver's price slump won't last long, so now is the time to buy silver for maximum profit. Here are five reasons why silver could double over the next year.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

India Infoline Housing Finance bonds issue opens today

Top Safest Stocks To Invest In Right Now

The issue will close on December 20, 2013. IIHFL, the housing finance arm of India Infoline , retains the option to close on such earlier date or extended date up to a period of 30 days from the date of opening of the issue.

The company aims to raise Rs 500 crore (NCD issue aggregating up to Rs 250 crore with an option to retain over-subscription up to Rs 250 crore).

IIHFL's maiden public issue of IIFL Home Bonds with 5-year tenor, is offering a coupon rate of 11.52 percent per annum payable monthly.

The NCDs proposed to be issued under this issue has been rated AA-/stable by CRISIL and AA- by CARE that indicates instruments with this rating are considered to have a high degree of safety regarding timely servicing of financial obligations. Such instruments carry very low credit risk.

The NCDs are proposed to be listed on the National Stock Exchange of India and BSE.

The funds raised through the issue, after meeting the expenditures of and related to the issue, will be used for the financing activities including lending and investments, repaying existing loans and business operations including for capital expenditure and working capital requirements.

Axis Capital Limited, Trust Investment Advisors Private Limited, India Infoline Limited and Edelweiss Financial Services Limited are the lead managers to the issue. RR Investors Capital Services (P) Limited, Karvy Investor Services Limited and SMC Capitals Limited are the co-lead managers to the issue. Link Intime India Private Limited is the registrar to the issue.

The recent NCD issue of India Infoline Finance, parent company of IIHFL, raised Rs 1,050 crore.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Regulators Approve Volcker Rule, the Core of Dodd-Frank

After three years of collaboration, five regulators on Tuesday approved the Volcker Rule, 100-plus pages of rules and regulations at the center of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law. The Volcker Rule primarily prohibit banks from engaging in proprietary trading as well as owning, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or private equity fund.

The rule was adopted jointly by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The Fed and FDIC unanimously voted to adopt the rule, while the SEC passed it by a 3-2 vote. The two Republican SEC Commissioners Michael Piwowar and Daniel Gallagher voted against the rule. Piwowar, who joined the agency in August, told CNBC at the ICI Global Trading and Market Structure Conference in London recently that he would vote against the proposed rule in its current form. “The devil’s in the detail,” he told CNBC. “The question for me has always been: How do you define the terms?”

All five agencies proposed the same common rules in 2011 and 2012. Those proposals generated more than 18,000 comment letters.

President Barack Obama on Tuesday said the final rule, as part of Wall Street reform, "makes sure big banks can’t make risky bets with their customer’s deposits" by making "it illegal for firms to use government-insured money to make speculative bets that threaten the entire financial system, and demand a new era of accountability from CEOs who must sign off on their firm’s practices." He encouraged Congress to provide the regulators with adequate funding to "effectively and efficiently" implement the rule.

Top 10 Casino Companies To Buy Right Now

SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White said in a statement that the Volcker Rule “is central to the framework put in place by the Dodd-Frank Act to promote the financial stability of the United States in the wake of the financial crisis.”

To carry out the mandate of Section 619 of the Dodd Frank Act, “the final rule seeks to focus U.S. banks and their affiliates on customer-directed activities, and to prevent the risks to U.S. taxpayers that can flow from proprietary trading and investments in private funds,” White said. The final rule “has been written to carry out these objectives while maintaining the strength and flexibility of the U.S. capital markets by allowing both domestic and foreign financial firms to continue to participate meaningfully in those markets where they are permitted to do so.”

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Johnson, D-S.D., released a statement that approval of the Volcker Rule was “a key milestone in the full implementation of Wall Street reform,” adding that these trading restrictions “will help improve the integrity of our banking system.”

The final rules become effective April 1, 2014, however the Fed has extended the conformance period until July 21, 2015. The rule will apply to large bank holding companies but not to community banks with less than $10 billion in assets that don’t participate in activities listed under the rule.

Like the Dodd-Frank Act, the final rules provide exemptions for certain activities, including market making, underwriting, hedging, trading in government obligations, insurance company activities, and organizing and offering hedge funds or private equity funds. The final rules also clarify that certain activities are not prohibited, including acting as agent, broker or custodian. /* .premium-promo { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 10px; margin: 0 10px 10px 0; width: 200px; float: left; } .premium-promo li, .premium-promo ul { list-style-type: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; } .premium-promo li { margin: 0 0 10px; padding: 0 0 10px; border-bottom: 1px dotted #ddd; } .premium-promo h3 { text-transform: uppercase; font-size: 11px; } .premium-promo h4 { font-size: 16px; } .premium-promo a { text-decoration: none !important; } .premium-promo .btn { background: #0069a1; border-radius: 4px; display: inline-block; padding: 5px 10px; clear: both; color: #fff; font-weight: bold; } .premium-promo .btn:hover { background: #034c92; } */ The compliance requirements under the final rules vary based on the size of the banking entity and the scope of activities conducted. "Banking entities with significant trading operations will be required to establish a detailed compliance program and their CEOs will be required to attest that the program is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the final rule," according to the SEC. Independent testing and analysis of an institution’s compliance program will also be required.

As White explained, the final rule “faithfully and strongly implements the statutory prohibitions on proprietary trading by U.S. banks and their affiliates and the limitations on the ability of such entities to sponsor or invest in hedge funds or private equity funds, called ‘covered funds’ in the rule.”

As to market making and underwriting, White said the rule “takes a measured, tailored approach to market making and underwriting activities as statutory exceptions to the prohibition on proprietary trading.” Permitted market making activities, she said, “can include trading in a wide variety of financial and derivative instruments, including those for which there is relatively limited liquidity, but only provided the firm is ready, willing, and able on request to provide quotes and respond to trading interest on both sides of the market.”

The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to all transactions entered into by a foreign bank and its foreign affiliates. “The final rule will permit these entities to engage in certain limited proprietary trading activity with U.S. firms, but only if the risks of such trading activity are held and managed outside the United States,” White said. “Foreign banks will, for example, be able to conduct cleared transactions through U.S. exchanges and with unaffiliated, regulated U.S. market intermediaries, she explained.

As to the scope of covered funds, the final rule also fulfills the statutory goal of limiting the ability of U.S. banks and their affiliates to sponsor or invest in hedge funds and private equity funds. “The Dodd-Frank Act defined a ‘hedge fund’ and ‘private equity fund’ by reference to regulatory exemptions that are commonly used by such funds,” White said. “The proposal carried forward this definition of a “covered fund,” and included certain commodity pools and foreign funds as well.”

But White said that adoption of the final rule is just the beginning. “Our work… does not end with today’s rule. We begin a new phase of monitoring and responsive engagement to ensure that the Volcker Rule is a strong, workable framework that achieves the objectives set for us.”

Consistent with the agency’s experience in other rulemakings, she said, “questions will arise following today’s action, some of which will require clarification. We must be alert to both unintended impacts and regulatory loopholes as we move forward.”

-----

Check out these related stories on ThinkAdvisor:

Monday, December 9, 2013

U.S. household wealth reaches record high

WASHINGTON (AP) — A surging stock market and a steady recovery in home prices drove Americans' wealth to a record last summer.

The nation's wealth rose 2.6% from July through September to $77.3 trillion, the Federal Reserve said Monday. Household wealth has been rising gradually since bottoming at $57.2 trillion in 2008. Early this year, America finally regained all the wealth it had lost to the Great Recession.

Rising personal wealth has been a pillar of the slow but steady U.S. economic recovery and could continue to boost the economy next year. When Americans feel richer, they typically spend more and fuel economic growth.

Household wealth, or net worth, reflects the value of homes, stocks, bank accounts and other assets minus mortgages, credit cards and other debts.

From July through September, rising stock prices boosted Americans' net worth by $917 billion. Higher home values added $428 billion more.

The Fed's figures don't go beyond September. But stock prices have continued to rise since last quarter ended, which means household wealth has, too. Since Oct. 1, the Standard & Poor's 500 stock index has risen nearly 8%. Home prices in many areas have continued to rise, though more slowly than they did earlier in the year.

The Fed's report also showed that Americans are willing to borrow more. This suggests that many are growing more confident in their jobs and in the broader economy.

When adjusted for inflation, net worth remains about 1% below its pre-recession peak. But the gains in stock and home prices during the current October-December quarter will likely lift inflation-adjusted household wealth to a record.

Still, the gains haven't been equally distributed. The wealthiest 10% of U.S. households own about 80% of stocks. And home ownership has declined since the recession, particularly among lower-income Americans.

Monday's report also showed that total mortgage debt rose 0.9% from the previous quarter. It was the first such increase s! ince early 2009. The rise reflects rising home sales and fewer mortgage defaults, an encouraging sign.

Americans are also holding more consumer debt outside of mortgages, in the form of student loans, auto loans and credit cards. Consumer debt rose 6% from the previous quarter.

But with job creation steady and wages rising gradually, Americans appear able to handle the additional borrowing.

Total after-tax income is rising faster than borrowing. That trend has boosted Americans' debts, as a percentage of income, to 99%. Before the recession, that ratio had peaked at about 125%, an unsustainable level in the view of many economists.

Paul Edelstein, an economist at IHS Global Insight, says that improving household finances could make Americans more willing to spend. But that could hinge on their willingness to borrow. If consumers remain hesitant to take on more debt, their improved finances won't necessary lead to big gains in spending.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

10 classic USA brands that are foreign-owned

In September, major U.S. pork producer Smithfield Foods was purchased by Chinese holding company Shanghui International Holdings for $4.7 billion. The deal represents the largest purchase of a U.S. company by a Chinese entity. Of course, it isn't the first major U.S. brand to be acquired by a foreign operation.

Established American brands are extremely valuable to foreign companies. Building a reputation in this country, which is one of the largest consumer markets in the world, can take decades, if it can be done at all. Many of America's most well-known names have been around since the 19th century. 24/7 Wall St. examined 10 famous brands founded in the U.S. that are no longer owned by American companies.

Many of these brands are not just iconic American names because they were founded and developed in the U.S., but also because they marketed themselves over the years as American. Budweiser beer, introduced by Anheuser-Busch in St. Louis in 1876, is the most widely known American beer brand. In 2008, Anheuser-Busch was purchased by Belgian-Brazilian conglomerate InBev. The company continues to market Budweiser as American, and even introduced an "American Ale" the same year, although that line has been discontinued.

Nearly all of these brands were purchased by an international conglomerate with large and diversified brand portfolios. Notably, Anglo-Dutch giant Unilever has purchased several of the iconic brands on this list, including Hellmann's and Good Humor.

These are 10 classic American brands that are foreign-owned.

1. Lucky Strike
• Founded: 1871
• Sector: Tobacco
• Current parent company: British American Tobacco
• Currently headquartered: England

The Lucky Strike Cigarettes company was founded in Virginia in 1871. At the turn of the century, American Tobacco Co. acquired the brand. The North Carolina-based company was one of the first to implement cigarette-manufacturing machines. During their heyday, through the first half of the 20t! h century, Lucky Strike was one of the top-selling tobacco brands, and was the No. 1 cigarette in the country by the 1930s. While sales have fallen since then, the brand has seen a modest resurgence lately due in part to the use of the cigarettes in the popular TV dramatic series "Mad Men." In 1994, U.K.-based British American Tobacco acquired the American Tobacco Co. and its subsidiaries.

Top 5 Tech Companies To Buy For 2014

2. Budweiser
• Founded: 1852
• Sector: Beverages
• Current parent company: Anheuser-Busch Inbev
• Currently headquartered: Belgium

Iconic American lager Budweiser was developed in 1876 by Adolphus Busch — son-in-law of German immigrant Eberhard Anheuser — and his friend Carl Conrad. It was the first American brewery to use pasteurization, allowing the company to ship the beer over large distances and reach a wider audience. Over the years, Budweiser became America's best-selling beer prompting the company to adopt the slogan: "The King of Beers." In 2008, Brazilian-Belgian company InBev purchased Anheuser-Busch Cos. for roughly $52 billion. Budweiser remains the top-selling beer brand in the U.S., with 2012 Bud Light sales close to $6 billion in 2012, more than any other brand, according to market research firm SymphonyIRI Group.

3. Vaseline
• Founded: 1876
• Sector: Skin Products
• Current parent company: Unilever
• Currently headquartered: England

Brooklyn chemist Robert A. Chesebrough developed petroleum jelly in 1870 from what was then considered a waste product from oil drilling. The substance can be used to treat injuries such as burns, cuts, and diaper rash. Chesebrough began marketing it as Vaseline in 1870, and it wasn't long before the brand became the most popular petroleum jelly product nationwide. By the early 20th century Chesebrough Manufacturing Co. was selling and manufacturing its product inter! nationall! y. Anglo-Dutch multinational consumer goods company Unilever acquired Vaseline in 1987.

4. Good Humor
• Founded: 1923
• Category: Ice cream
• Current parent company: Unilever
• Currently headquartered: England

In 1923, Harry B. Burt of Youngstown, Ohio, patented his new method of making frozen confections — freezing ice cream bars to wooden handles and coating them in a hard chocolate layer. According to Burt, the value of the new process was in its sanitation and cleanliness. Instead of opening a store to sell his new Good Humor bars, Burt organized a fleet of ice-cream trucks with bells and carefully trained white-clad salesmen. When its founder died in 1926, the company went public and successfully expanded across much of the U.S. Unilever subsidiary Lipton purchased Good Humor in 1961.

5. Hellmann's
• Founded: 1913
• Sector: Condiments
• Current parent company: Unilever
• Currently headquartered: England

Capitalizing on his wife's popular mayonnaise recipe, German immigrant Richard Hellmann founded Hellmann's delicatessen over 100 years ago in New York City. In 1932, West Coast mayonnaise competitor Best Foods acquired Hellmann's. By that time, Hellmann's was flourishing and had already expanded across much of the East Coast, introducing new condiments including its Tartar Sauce and Sandwich Spread, a combination of relish and mayonnaise. In 2000, Anglo-Dutch multinational consumer goods company Unilever acquired Best Foods and its subsidiaries. The company claims Best Food and Hellmann's mayonnaise, which are sold on the West and East coasts respectively, are identical products.

6. Purina
• Founded: 1894
• Sector: Pet food
• Current parent company: Nestle
• Currently headquartered: Switzerland

Founded in St. Louis in 1894 by William H. Danforth, George Robinson and William Andrews, the original Purina company was initially known for its wheat cereal. Company president Danforth revolutionized th! e product! ion of pet food by producing animal feeds in pellet form and renamed the company Ralston Purina. General Mills acquired Ralston's cereal business in 1997. Swiss multinational food manufacturer Nestle merged with Ralston Purina Co. in December 2001, creating a new division, Nestle Purina PetCare.

7. French's
• Founded: 1876
• Sector: Condiments
• Current parent company: Reckitt Benckiser
• Currently headquartered: England

Francis French, co-owner of R.T. French Co., expanded his father's spice business to include a prepared mustard spread, which in general was not commercially available in 1904. Since its introduction at that year's World's Fair in St. Louis, French's mustard has become an American staple. According to the company, French's can be found in roughly 36% of all U.S. households. The company was acquired by a foreign entity early in its history. In 1926, J&J Colman, based in the U.K., purchased French's for $3.8 million. Now, after two additional mergers, French's is controlled by U.K.-based Reckitt Benckiser.

8. Frigidaire
• Founded: 1918
• Cateogry: Appliances
• Current parent company: AB Electrolux
• Currently headquartered: Sweden

The Guardian Frigerator Co. was founded in 1916 to manufacture the newly developed electric refrigerating units. Prior to the invention, consumers generally kept their food cold with ice boxes. Compression-driven air conditioning was a novel concept. General Motors purchased the refrigerator manufacturer just two years later, naming it Frigidaire. Over the following few decades, General Motors often competed with Kelvinator and General Electric for top share in the new lucrative refrigeration market. In 1979, White Consolidated Industries, also an American company, acquired Frigidaire. Seven years later, however, the company changed hands again when it was acquired by multinational Swedish appliance manufacturer AB Electrolux.

9. Popsicle
• Founded: 1923
• Product: Ice cream
�! �� Curren! t parent company: Unilever
• Currently headquartered: England

Popsicle, touted as an "American classic," began by accident when 11-year old Frank Epperson left a stick in a cup of soda outside in freezing temperatures in 1905. Epperson sold the product to the Popsicle Corporation, and the frozen fruit juice on a stick was on its way to becoming an American icon. Following complicated legal battles between the ice pop company and ice cream manufacturer Good Humor over the definition of ice cream, Good Humor acquired Popsicle in 1989. Eventually, Anglo–Dutch multinational consumer goods company Unilever acquired Good Humor and its subsidiaries.

10. 7-Eleven
• Founded: 1946
• Product: Convenience stores
• Current parent company: Seven & I Holdings
• Currently headquartered: Japan

7-Eleven, aptly-named for its extended hours, was one of the first convenience retailers. Jefferson Green, an employee at Dallas, Tex.-based Southland Ice Co., began offering milk, bread, and eggs at one of Southland's ice houses in 1927. As the ice houses grew in popularity, they became convenience outlets and came to be known as Tote'm stores, because "customers 'toted' away their purchases." It was not until 1946 that the stores changed their name to 7-Eleven. Today, 7-Eleven is the world's largest convenience store franchisor. In 2005, Seven-Eleven Japan completed its purchase of 7-Eleven, Inc, becoming Seven & I Holdings, Co. Ltd.

24/7 Wall St. is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news and commentary. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Report: 8 states with the highest minimum wage

Report: 10 countries where people live the longest

Report: Top 10 cars with the best resale value

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Mexican shoppers head to Texas to avoid higher tax

SAN MARCOS, Texas — Texas retailers are getting an early Christmas gift this year from their southern neighbor: swarms of eager Mexican shoppers.

A recent sales tax hike in Mexico's northern region has been sending Mexican citizens north of the border — in cars, planes and tour buses — for their Christmas shopping. The shoppers — looking to save money and score on the latest brand names of TVs, toys and clothing — are arriving by the busload from as far away as Mexico City and Jalisco to outlet centers and malls across Texas, said Pete Garcia, executive director of the South Texas chapter of the United States-Mexico Chamber of Commerce.

"It will be a huge benefit for all of South Texas, from the border of El Paso to McAllen all the way up to San Antonio, San Marcos and Houston," he said. "You're going to see a significant jump in those shoppers."

Mexican lawmakers in October raised the sales tax in the country's northern region from 11% to 16% — or twice the rate in most Texas municipalities, said Tom Fullerton, professor of economics and finance at the University of Texas-El Paso. Mexico's northern region had enjoyed a lower rate for decades to compete with U.S. retailers across the border, but the tax was raised to equal the rest of the country as part of nationwide tax reforms, he said. Texas' statewide sales tax is 6.25%, but municipalities can raise that another 2 percentage points.

Mexican residents typically account for around $4.5 billion in retail sales in Texas counties along the Mexican border, Fullerton said. That number is expected to jump by $225 million due to the new tax hike, with retailers as far inland as Houston and San Antonio reaping the benefits, he said.

Even though the tax increase doesn't go into effect until January, the bad publicity the measure received in Mexico is driving shoppers across the border early for their Christmas shopping, Fullerton said.

"This was a very controversial bill in Mexico," he said. "There will be a lot ! of customers who will be shopping across the border even before the actual tax occurs."

At the Tanger Outlets in San Marcos on Saturday, white passenger buses with Mexican plates pulled up to the curb and dislodged clusters of Spanish-speaking passengers who headed straight to Old Navy, Calvin Klein, Banana Republic and other stores. The parking lot resembled a lot in Guadalajara or Monterrey, crowded with cars with license plates from Coahula, Nuevo Leon, Jalisco, Tamaulipas and Ciudad Mexico.

Ernesto Rangel, 45, drove the 14 hours from Mexico City to San Marcos to get the latest models in electronics and clothing, do some Christmas shopping — and avoid the higher sales tax.

"It's cheaper, and we find things you can't find in Mexico," he said as he positioned a new Phillips surround sound system in the trunk of his car. "I can do all my Christmas shopping here."

5 Best Safest Stocks To Invest In 2014

Mexican residents make up such a significant part of the outlet center's sales that management recently printed off promotional posters and brochures in Spanish and plastered them around the sprawling center, said John Lairsen, the outlet center's general manager. "I'll assume we'll continue to see that increase" with the new tax hike, he said.

Outside, one of the large white passenger vans contained the family of Carlos Gomez, 54, of Jalisco, Mexico. Gomez was leading his extended family — 28 people from five families — on a shopping and sightseeing tour that included stops in San Antonio, Houston and San Marcos. The caravan drove from Jalisco, past the malls in northern Mexico and straight to the outlet center in San Marcos, where they hoped to stock up on designer clothes, electronic toys and TVs.

Having so many shops in one place makes it worth the trip, he said.

"We do it for the convenience and for the sales," Gomez said. "Plus, we make a vacation out of it! ."

Friday, December 6, 2013

4 Stocks Under $10 to Trade for Breakouts

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- At Stockpickr, we track daily portfolios of stocks that are the biggest percentage gainers and the biggest percentage losers.

>>5 Big Trades to Take in December

Stocks that are making large moves like these are favorites among short-term traders because they can jump into these names and try to capture some of that massive volatility. Stocks that are making big-percentage moves either up or down are usually in play because their sector is becoming attractive or they have a major fundamental catalyst such as a recent earnings release. Sometimes stocks making big moves have been hit with an analyst upgrade or an analyst downgrade.

Regardless of the reason behind it, when a stock makes a large-percentage move, it is often just the start of a new major trend -- a trend that can lead to huge profits. If you time your trade correctly, combining technical indicators with fundamental trends, discipline and sound money management, you will be well on your way to investment success.

>>5 Stocks Insiders Love Right Now

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at a several stocks under $10 that are making large moves to the upside today.

Orbitz Worldwide

Orbitz Worldwide (OWW) is an online travel company that uses innovative technology to enable leisure and business travelers to search for and book a range of travel products. This stock closed up 2.1% to $7 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $6.80-$7.11

52-Week Range: $2.26-$13.26

Thursday's Volume: 1.35 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 1.01 million

From a technical perspective, OWW spiked notably higher here with above-average volume. This stock has formed a major bottoming pattern over the last month, with buyers stepping in to support the stock at $6.68, $6.50 and $6.60. Shares of OWW have now started to uptrend off those support levels and flirt with a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if OWW manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $7 to $7.10 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in OWW as long as it's trending above some near-term support levels at $6.50 or at $6.40 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 1.01 million shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then OWW will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels a $7.55 to its 200-day at $8.25. Any high-volume move above $8.25 will then give OWW a chance to re-fill some of its previous gap down zone from November that started at $9.59.

China BAK Battery

China BAK Battery (CBAK) is a manufacturer of rechargeable lithium-based battery cells. This stock closed up 8.9% to $2.19 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $2.01-$2.19

52-Week Range: $0.59-$3.45

Thursday's Volume: 209,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 154,248

From a technical perspective, CBAK ripped sharply higher here right above some near-term support at $2 with above-average volume. This stock has formed a triple bottom chart pattern over the last month and change, with shares finding buying interest at $1.95, $2 and $2. Shares of CBAK now look ready to trigger a near-term breakout trade as the stock bounces off those support levels. That trade will hit if CBAK manages to take out Thursday's high of $2.19 to its 50-day moving average of $2.24 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in CBAK as long as it's trending above $2 or above $1.95 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 154,248 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then CBAK will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $2.50 to $2.80. Any high-volume move above those levels will then give CBAK a chance to tag $3 or even its 52-week high at $3.45.

MEI Pharma

MEI Pharma (MEIP) is a development-stage oncology company engaged in the clinical development of novel small molecules for the treatment of cancer. This stock closed up 3.7% to $8.27 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $8.06-$8.52

52-Week Range: $4.37-$13.20

Thursday's Volume: 119,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 153,008

From a technical perspective, MEIP spiked higher here back above its 200-day moving average of $8.19 with lighter-than-average volume. This move is starting to push shares of MEIP within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if MEIP manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $8.55 to its 50-day moving average of $8.75 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in MEIP as long as it's trending above some near-term support at $7.72 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 153,008 shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then MEIP will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $10 to $10.95. Any high-volume move above those levels will then give MEIP a chance to trend north of $11.

xG Technology

xG Technology (XGTI) develops intellectual property designed to enhance wired and wireless communications. This stock closed up 4.2% to $1.70 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $1.62-$1.72

52-Week Range: $0.20-$9.50

Thursday's Volume: 132,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 81,305

From a technical perspective, XGTI spiked sharply higher here right above some near-term support at $1.57 with above-average volume. This move is quickly pushing shares of XGTI within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if XGTI manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $1.72 to $1.73 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in XGTI as long as it's trending above some key near-term support levels at $1.57 or at $1.53 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 81,305 shares. If that breakout triggers soon, then XGTI will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $2.50 to $2.75.

To see more stocks that are making notable moves higher today, check out the Stocks Under $10 Moving Higher portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>3 Stocks Breaking Out on Big Volume



>>5 Health Care Stocks Ready to Cut You a Dividend Check



>>5 Stocks Set to Soar on Bullish Earnings

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com. You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Thursday, December 5, 2013

Ex-LPL, Schwab Recruiter Opens Office to Help Advisors Go Indie

Veteran recruiter Al McIntee is relying on his 13 years of experience with LPL Financial (LPLA), Charles Schwab (SCHW) and Cetera Advisor Networks to start a new business for advisors who want to go independent or change their business model.

The number of options for advisors has gone way up over the past decade or so, and reps need someone to help them with “the exhaustive discovery work,” says McIntee, 46, who worked as an advisor for Merrill Lynch (BAC) when he started in the field.

For instance, there are the numerous regulatory and financial considerations that go along with understanding whether or not it’s worthwhile to form your own RIA, he explains. “Many financial advisors think the hybrid-RIA model may be right for them, and I can help demystify what independence is,” said McIntee in a phone interview with ThinkAdvisor.  

The average third-party industry recruiter aims to put advisors in touch with five broker-dealers. “They do a high-volume business and need to place advisors where they can collect the highest fees. It can be very impersonal, and a lot of the work is done online.”

Rather than helping advisors simply switch firms, McIntee says he tailors his services. “I can look at their books of business and discuss the merits of forming their own RIA or working with a corporate RIA and of staying with a hybrid model vs. going RIA only,” he shared.

In addition, issues like software programs for portfolio management and client relationships, back-office integration and licensing have to be carefully discussed.

“Advisors want some flexibility. They need to understand what model is right for their book of business,” explained McIntee, whose office is located in the Greater San Diego area. “A generic recruiter typically tries to get an advisor in touch with four or five broker-dealers and hope that one sticks.”

Current Operations

McIntee, who is meeting with several potential clients in New York this week, says his sweet spot is working with wirehouse advisors who want to go independent or IBD reps "looking to find better mousetraps." This includes working with reps who may have a good percentage of their business in separately managed accounts, for instance, and with clients who need collateralized lending.

“I want to do the legwork for the advisor,” he explained. “Also, reps can get paralysis analysis when they are poring over spreadsheets. I can look at their mix of business and goals and narrow the search down to two or three of the top firms after doing lots of due diligence.” The work is “platform agnostic,” he adds.

His target reps and teams have about $400,000-$500,000 in yearly fees and commissions or more and at least $50 million in assets under management. In general, recruiters receive about 5%-7% of an advisor’s trailing 12-month production after a recruiting deal is signed — about 3% or 4% up front. The recruiting broker-dealer pays these fees, not the advisor, according to McIntee. Custodial firms typically pay recruiters 5-6 basis points for assets under management that are moved to them.

10 Best Blue Chip Stocks For 2014

Working with a recruiter means an advisor’s confidentiality can be protected during the process, so an existing broker-dealer won’t find out a rep is looking around and getting ready to move.

“There are recruiters that will tell advisors just what they want to hear,” McIntee cautioned. “I can decipher the white noise, since I know what drives profitability. I can get advisors the top transitional assistance, as I know how margins and technology work."

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Brown-Forman Corporation Beats Q2 Estimates; Reaffirms Outlook (BF-B)

Before the bell on Wednesday, Brown-Forman (BF-B) announced its second quarter and first half earnings results, posting increases in sales and earnings.

BF-B Earnings in Brief

-Brown-Forman reported net sales for Q2 of $1.08 billion, a 6% increase from 2012′s Q2 sales of $1.01 billion.
-The company’s net income came in at $206 million, or 96 cents per diluted share, and increase from last year’s Q2 net income of $173 million, or 80 cents per diluted share.
-Brown-Forman beat analysts’ estimates of 91 cents EPS on revenues of $1.04 billion.
-The alcoholic beverages company reaffirmed its guidance for fiscal 2014, and sees EPS in the range of $2.80-$3.00.

CEO Commentary

Brown-Forman CEO Paul Varga had the following comments: "Fueled by the Jack Daniel's trademark, the company's second quarter and first half results were very strong. We continued to generate an excellent balance of geographic growth, including strong growth in the emerging markets. We are particularly pleased with Brown-Forman's results in light of recent industry commentary around a slowdown in global spirits momentum, and we are reaffirming our expectations for excellent full year growth in underlying operating income."

Recent Dividend Increase

Brown-Forman announced a 13.7% increase to its dividend payout on November 21. The payout increased to 29 cents per quarter, or $1.16 annually. The dividend is payable on December 27, 2013 to all shareholders on record as of December 11.

Stock Performance

Investors have not had a chance to react to BF-B’s strong quarter, as the stock was inactive in pre-market trading. YTD, the stock is up 16.55%.

Monday, December 2, 2013

The Big Pharma Stock Making Gains (and The One Suffering Big Losses)

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- While the biopharmaceutical industry as a whole has had an impressive year, not every stock in sector was celebrating on Monday. Small-caps Merrimack Pharmaceuticals (MACK) and Orexigen Therapeutics (OREX) were making moves but in opposite directions.

Orexigen Therapeutics, which specializes in drug treatments for obesity, had plummeted 7% to $6.37 by mid-morning. Earlier in the day, the company announced a proposed offering of $100 million in convertible senior notes due 2020 to institutional investors. Initial buyers will also have a 13-day option to purchase an additional $15 million in notes.

Prior to the announcement, shares had run up 30.1% over the year, short of the 63.4% in gains the iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index ETF  (IBB)IBB has seen since January.

More typical of the sector in 2013, Merrimack had gained 4% to $4.10, a residual effect of last Tuesday's announcement the company had partnered with global pharmaceutical leader Actavis. The Cambridge, Mass.-based business signed a 10-year partnership agreement with Actavis to develop new treatments using the former's nanoliposomal technology. Merrimack will receive up to $15.5 million, $2 million of which will be upfront, as part of the agreement. It will also have a "double-digit share of net profits on global sales", according to the company's SEC filing. The developments signal a welcome turnaround for the company's share prices which had suffered a 48.4% year-to-date loss prior to the announcement. Over the four trading days since, shares have soared 31.2%. --Written by Keris Alison Lahiff.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Are You Earning Too Little?

Closeup of  paycheckAlamy Personal finance author Barbara Stanny realized she was earning too little money when she interviewed women bringing home six figures or more for one of her books. "Of the first 15, three of them were writers. It was such an empowering thing for me to see. There were people doing what I was doing, but they were making more," she recalls. She committed to follow their lead, and before she finished her book, she had started earning six figures herself. Earning too little money, which Stanny defines as earning less than you need or desire, despite efforts to do otherwise, is a problem so common that Stanny started giving workshops on the topic. Eventually, it became the subject of her next book, "Overcoming Underearning." Others have also tackled the issue: Underearners Anonymous, a support group based on a 12-step program, is dedicated to helping people who find themselves trapped in a low-income cycle. And Bari Tessler Linden, a popular financial therapist, addresses the topic in her work, too. Tom Anderson, a freelance writer based in New York, wrote about visiting an Underearners Anonymous meeting for the financial website LearnVest earlier this year. "The median age was mid-40s, and it was a pretty diverse bunch of people from all different socioeconomic backgrounds," he told U.S. News. The session focused on improving time management skills, goal setting and being more career focused, he says. After the meeting, he says, "I did adjust my own expectations for my finances and what revenue targets I wanted to hit." Anderson says he would recommend the experience to anyone who is comfortable with the spiritual side of 12-step programs and who is not doing a good job of valuing their time, which often has a negative impact on earning power. (Underearners Anonymous did not respond to requests for comment.) Financial therapist Linden says in order to overcome her own struggle with underearning (in her 20s, she worked in hospice and as a counselor, and she couldn't afford organic food), she had to first learn to value herself better. "I had to do a lot of work on cultivating my value and what this means to me," she says. She also had to learn that it was OK to want to earn more money. "I thought if I did good work, money would just appear. But it also did not feel spiritual to me to strive for money," she says. Still, she knew she had to find a way to earn more. So she took on extra overnight shifts at hospice, but was still stuck earning less than $2,000 a month. She took on a second job, and eventually earned enough for some small indulgences, like chocolate. Then, she learned about bookkeeping, took on clients and started earning more money. Today, she's built an online business based around her financial therapy and coaching work that allows her to earn a six-figure income. "It's about the numbers, but of course it's also about having a deeply meaningful and joyful life, giving amazing work to the world and having a great lifestyle. And we all define that in our own ways," she says. As for Stanny, she says her own underearning struggles grew out of larger money issues. She recalls her father, one of the founders of H&R Block (HRB), teaching her little about smart money management. "The only thing my father ever told me was, 'Don't worry,'" she says. Later, her husband, a compulsive gambler, created a new set of financial problems for her. She finally decided she had to learn how to manage (and make) her own money. Overcoming underearning is all about shifting your thinking, Stanny says. "We tend to push our financial problems under the rug and ignore our problems and think they'll go away. [Instead,] I made a decision: I'm going to overcome underearning," Stanny says. Making that kind of mental shift can be uncomfortable, she adds, but it's essential for making a significant change. The biggest lesson she learned from high earners, she says, is to say yes to opportunities. "If any opportunity comes along, as long as it's not illegal or immoral, they just say 'yes,'" she says of high earners. Even if something makes them nervous, like a new speaking gig, high-earners welcome the opportunity. To overcome her own under-earning trap, Stanny started raising her speaking fees. It made her uncomfortable, and for the first three months, she got few takers, but eventually, she started booking gigs at her higher rate. "I knew I deserved to earn more for no other reason than I'm worth it," Stanny says. Cultivating that sense of self-worth is crucial for overcoming underearning.